COSCO pays up at cost to dry-bulk trade

Date:2011-09-07     Source:liminglile  Text Size:

By Olivia Chung

HONG KONG - A long-running payments dispute in which state-owned China COSCO Holdings withheld payments on high-priced contracts has tainted its reputation, industry analysts said after it was revealed it had resumed some charter payments.

The shipping dispute threatens the credit worthiness of the dry-bulk industry as a whole, and any downward negotiation of contracted charter rates would be negative for dry-bulk shipowners, Moody's said in its weekly credit market report.

"Charter rates are currently much lower than they were in 2008 and renegotiation of contracts could set a precedent that spurs other Chinese shipping companies to seek more favorable terms in their existing agreements," it said.

Two international shipowners confirmed that China's largest

 
shipping company has resumed charter-hire payments. Raymond Ching, vice-president of Jinhui Shipping, which is listed in Oslo and based in Hong Kong, told Asia Times Online that COSCO had paid the company to settle a five-year dispute over lease payments.

"Some of the hire payments had been delayed for five years given the contracts involved were signed in 2007 and 2009, for which the COSCO paid higher charter rates especially compared to today's rates," said Ching, who declined to provide details, including how much COSCO had owed and if the contracted charter rates had been changed as COSCO sought to renegotiate its charter agreements.

"Anyway, the issue with COSCO is over and everybody's fine," Ching said.

Many of the shipping contracts involved were signed during the 2008 shipping boom, when the benchmark Baltic Exchange Dry Index (BDI) hit a record high of 11,793 points in May that year. The the benchmark index for the dry-bulk shipping market last week stood at 1,537, down 87% from its peak, after plummeting in the global economic downturn and an oversupply of vessels.

COSCO withheld payments for vessels chartered long-term for as much as $80,000 a day. Average spot-market rates to charter Capesize vessels - the largest class - stood at $16,716 a day last month.

China COSCO Holdings president Zhang Liang said during the firm's results briefing late last month that charter disputes were a common business problem. Zhang said the parent company and its subsidiaries had charters for more than 400 ships but "the percentage of disputes was small compared with the overall number of charters".

China COSCO posted a first-half loss of 2.76 billion yuan (US$433 million) after a collapse in rates for carrying commodities and containers.

The company had at least three vessels arrested in the past two months as shipowners sought overdue payments, according to court filings in the US and Singapore, Bloomberg reported. Shares in the Hong Kong-listed company are down about 62% from their year-high of HK$9.35 to just below HK$4 on Monday.

Jinhui Shipping, owned by Hong Kong-listed Jinhui Holdings, was the first Asian-based shipowner to warn publicly of dire consequences after the extensive delays in charter payments. COSCO is or has been in dispute with several international shipowners, including Greece-based DryShips and Navios and Geneva-based Bunge SA, which have led to the seizure of at least three COSCO vessels in various ports.

Ching said in an interview with the Financial Times earlier that the company was in a similar position to those on whose contracts COSCO has already reneged, referring to other shipowners including DryShips CEO George Economou, who has threatened to seize the ships, and Bunga wining a court order for the arrest of a COSCO ship over unpaid ship leases.

In a case brought by Aren Maritime in July in Singapore, the shipowner sought US$8.58 million, according to Singapore court documents. China COSCO Holdings, a Hong Kong-listed subsidiary of China Ocean Shipping (Group) Company, was paying $87,000 a day for a Capesize vessel, the filing said.

DryShips chief financial officer Ziad Nakhleh confirmed that COSCO has resumed charter-hire payments and that the "little hiccup" with the Chinese counterparty is over. On a conference call, Nakhleh explained: "Our dispute is specific to COSCO Qingdao only, with which we have approximately US$2.5 million in unpaid hire for three of our vessels," according to Reuters.

DryShips has about 18 ships on charter to COSCO, the Financial Times reported.

China Ocean Shipping (Group) Company and its subsidiaries had 234 self-owned dry-bulk vessels and 201 chartered dry-bulk ships with a combined capacity of 3.79 million deadweight tons at the end of June, including 95 Capesize and 165 Panamax ships carrying iron ore and coal. This was up from 61 Capesize and 86 Panamax vessels in the first quarter.

In a statement at the end of last month, China COSCO Holdings said the disputes or the adjustment of hire rates was part of its "normal operations" and consistent with its business philosophy. It also said that its financial status and operational conditions were "sound and healthy".

While COSCO's attempt to resolve the unpaid payment disputes with shipowners appears to have been successful, COSCO's attempt to renegotiate contracted charter rates has annoyed industry players and analysts.

Ching for Jinhui Shipping said "COSCO has paid the payments, but the fact it cannot deny is it had been prolonging the payments."

Rebuffing COSCO's insistence that it is "normal operations" for such contract disputes, Ching said "normal operations" should be for those who refused to honor contracts to have their vessels arrested.

"The Baltic takes the view that a deal agreed between two parties stands, and it's simply not acceptable for one party alone to attempt to change the terms,” Jeremy Penn, chief executive of London's Baltic Exchange, was quoted as saying by the Financial Times.

Australia's Fortescue Metals Group was suspended as a Baltic Exchange member after it refused to honor contracts to ship goods at high prices with shipping companies when the dry- bulk cargo market and shipping rates collapsed in late 2008. The move led to several shipping companies filing for bankruptcy or protection from creditors.

2005-2011 www.researchinchina.com All Rights Reserved 京ICP备05069564号-1